Miliano v. Miliano

Miliano, 2012 ME 95 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine 2012) · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · July 24, 2012

Summary

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court reviewed a divorce judgment involving the classification and distribution of premarital real estate and an award of spousal support. The court held that the evidentiary record did not support treating the properties as marital or quantifying marital components and remanded for clarification or reconsideration of the property and support awards.

Holdings

  1. Property acquired before marriage is nonmarital property that must be set apart to the acquiring spouse unless the opposing spouse proves a legally recognized interest or a marital component of value.
  2. A divorce court has jurisdiction to determine specific legal or equitable claims to premaritally acquired property, but a party asserting such a claim must present and prove it, including the nature and extent of the claimed interest.
  3. A party asserting that nonmarital real property acquired a marital component must prove an increase in value or acquisition attributable to marital funds, property, or labor; the court may not arbitrarily establish or divide an unquantified marital component.
  4. When the relationship between an invalid property distribution and the spousal-support award is unclear, the matter must be remanded for clarification and possible reconsideration of the judgment, including spousal support.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the District Court erred by treating Alfred's premaritally acquired real estate as marital property or by distributing it based on an unquantified equitable interest.
  2. Whether the District Court could find marital components in the properties without evidence quantifying appreciation or value attributable to marital funds or labor.
  3. Whether the spousal-support award could be effectively reviewed when the District Court stated that the property distribution reduced the support award but did not explain the relationship between the property distribution and support.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (15)

  • Grishman v. Grishman, 407 A.2d 9, 10-12 (Me. 1979)(followed)
  • Ayotte v. Ayotte, 2009 ME 20, ¶¶ 6-7, 966 A.2d 883(followed)
  • Bond v. Bond, 2011 ME 54, ¶ 10, 17 A.3d 1219(followed)
  • Williams v. Williams, 645 A.2d 1118, 1120 (Me. 1994)(followed)
  • Long v. Long, 1997 ME 171, ¶ 9, 697 A.2d 1317(followed)
  • Theberge v. Theberge, 2010 ME 132, ¶¶ 18, 24, 9 A.3d 809(followed)
  • Libby v. Lorrain, 430 A.2d 37, 39 (Me. 1981)(followed)
  • Zeolla v. Zeolla, 2006 ME 118, ¶ 10, 908 A.2d 629(followed)
  • State v. Patterson, 2004 ME 79, ¶ 13, 851 A.2d 521(followed)
  • Spooner v. Spooner, 2004 ME 69, ¶ 18, 850 A.2d 354(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…