Judy Sparks v. Brant Sparks

2013 ME 41 (Me. 2013) · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · April 4, 2013 · No. Cum-12-73

Summary

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court held that Maine's protection from abuse statute permits a stepparent or other nonparent responsible for an abused child to receive temporary parental rights and responsibilities. The court concluded that such an award can satisfy substantive and procedural due process requirements when the parent has abused the child, the award is temporary and narrowly tailored, and the parent receives notice and an opportunity to be heard. Although the appeal was technically moot because the stepparent obtained a guardianship, the court reached the issue under the public-interest exception to mootness.

Holdings

  1. Although Judy's guardianship gave her the same practical rights she sought through the protection-from-abuse proceeding, the court could review the technically moot appeal under the public-interest exception because the issue was public, likely to recur, and required authoritative guidance.
  2. Maine's protection-from-abuse statute permits a nonparent who is a person responsible for the child to receive temporary parental rights and responsibilities when the nonparent seeks protection on behalf of the child against an abusive legal parent.
  3. An award of temporary parental rights to a nonparent responsible for an abused child does not violate the legal parent's substantive due process rights when the parent has abused the child, no other parent is willing or able to exercise parental rights, and the award is narrowly tailored to protect the child from harm or a threat of harm.
  4. Awarding temporary parental rights to Judy did not violate Brant's procedural due process rights because he was present at and participated in the hearing and had an opportunity to present evidence concerning the possible award.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appeal was moot after the Probate Court appointed Judy full guardian of the child, and, if so, whether the public-interest exception permitted review.
  2. Whether Maine's protection-from-abuse statute permits a nonparent who is a person responsible for a child to receive temporary parental rights and responsibilities for that child.
  3. Whether awarding temporary parental rights and responsibilities to such a nonparent violates the biological parent's substantive due process rights.
  4. Whether awarding temporary parental rights and responsibilities violated the biological parent's procedural due process rights where he participated in the protection-from-abuse hearing.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (13)

  • Int'l Paper Co. v. United Paperworkers Int'l Union, 551 A.2d 1356, 1360-61 (Me. 1988)(followed)
  • Young v. Young, 2002 ME 167, ¶¶ 7-11, 810 A.2d 418(followed)
  • King Res. Co. v. Envtl. Improvement Comm'n, 270 A.2d 863, 870 (Me. 1970)(followed)
  • L'Heureux v. Michaud, 2007 ME 149, ¶¶ 5, 7, 938 A.2d 801(followed)
  • In re Adoption of Tobias D., 2012 ME 45, ¶¶ 15, 20-21, 40 A.3d 990(followed)
  • Rideout v. Riendeau, 2000 ME 198, ¶¶ 12, 14, 16, 19-23, 26, 29-33, 761 A.2d 291(followed)
  • In re Melissa T., 2002 ME 31, ¶ 4, 791 A.2d 98(followed)
  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65-66 (2000)(followed)
  • In re Baby Duncan, 2009 ME 85, ¶ 13, 976 A.2d 935(limited)
  • J.M.R. v. S.T.R., 15 P.3d 253, 256 (Alaska 2001)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…