Summary
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed Tracy Dorweiler’s conviction for escape from arrest. The court held that sufficient evidence supported a finding that Dorweiler had been arrested through constructive seizure when she acknowledged the arrest warrant, heard that she was under arrest, and indicated that she wanted to put on clothing before going to jail. The court rejected the argument that her undisclosed subjective intent not to submit defeated the arrest.
Holdings
- The evidence was sufficient for a rational fact-finder to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Dorweiler had been arrested before she fled.
- The defendant's undisclosed subjective intent to flee or manipulate the officer did not preclude a finding that she submitted to constructive arrest.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Dorweiler had been arrested before she left through the bedroom window.
- Whether Dorweiler's conduct constituted submission to a constructive arrest despite her alleged subjective intent to manipulate the officer and flee.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- State v. Cote, 2015 ME 78, ¶ 2, 118 A.3d 805(followed)
- State v. Saucier, 2015 ME 144, ¶ 6, 126 A.3d 1159(followed)
- State v. Donahue, 420 A.2d 936, 937 (Me. 1980)(followed)
- State v. Powers, 386 A.2d 721, 728 (Me. 1978)(followed)
- State v. LaPlante, 2011 ME 85, ¶ 20 n.5, 26 A.3d 337(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…