Summary
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court addresses an interlocutory appeal from a discovery order issued during medical malpractice screening-panel proceedings. Because the parties completed the screening-panel process without producing the disputed nonparty medical records, the court held that the discovery order had become a nullity and remanded for any renewed discovery request to be considered by the Superior Court.
Holdings
- Under the unique circumstances of this case, the discovery order lost its vitality, ceased to be the law of the case, and became a nullity without legal force or effect after the parties completed the screening-panel process without producing the records.
- Neither the death-knell nor the collateral-order exception applied because the appellants could not demonstrate an irreparable loss of a claimed right from immediate nonreview of an order that had become a nullity.
- The court declined to decide whether a Superior Court judge acting as a medical malpractice screening-panel chair may issue an immediately appealable order compelling discovery over a claim of privilege or confidentiality.
Questions Presented
- Whether the interlocutory appeal from a discovery order entered during medical malpractice screening-panel proceedings was immediately reviewable under an exception to the final judgment rule.
- Whether the discovery order remained operative after the screening-panel proceedings concluded without production of the records.
- Whether the court should decide whether an order compelling discovery over a claim of privilege or confidentiality is immediately appealable.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- Gafner v. Down E. Cmty. Hosp., 1999 ME 130, ¶ 12 & n.4, 735 A.2d 969(followed and applied)
- Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v. Warren, 2011 ME 124, ¶ 19, 34 A.3d 1103(followed)
- Taylor v. Walker, 2017 ME 218, ¶ 8, 173 A.3d 539(followed)
- Estate of Cox v. E. Me. Med. Ctr., 2007 ME 15, ¶ 6, 915 A.2d 418(followed)
- Chretien v. Chretien, 2017 ME 192, ¶ 6, 170 A.3d 260(followed)
- In re Evelyn A., 2017 ME 182, ¶ 14, 169 A.3d 914(followed)
- Bond v. Bond, 2011 ME 105, ¶ 11, 30 A.3d 816(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…