Summary
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a judgment terminating Jonathan D.'s parental rights under 22 M.R.S. § 4055. The court held that the trial court's supported findings established that he remained unable to protect the child from jeopardy or assume responsibility within a time reasonably calculated to meet the child's needs, and that termination was in the child's best interest.
Holdings
- The District Court did not err in determining that the father remained unable to protect the child from jeopardy or take responsibility for the child within a time reasonably calculated to meet the child's needs.
- The District Court did not err or abuse its discretion in determining that termination of the father's parental rights was in the child's best interest.
Questions Presented
- Whether competent evidence and clear and convincing evidence supported termination of the father's parental rights on the grounds that he was unable or unwilling to protect the child from jeopardy or take responsibility for the child within a time reasonably calculated to meet the child's needs.
- Whether the District Court erred or abused its discretion in determining that termination of the father's parental rights was in the child's best interest.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- In re M.C., 2014 ME 128, ¶ 7, 104 A.3d 139(followed)
- In re Child of Gustavus E., 2018 ME 43, ¶ 8, 182 A.3d 153(followed)
- In re Thomas D., 2004 ME 104, ¶ 21, 854 A.2d 195(followed)
- In re Alexander D., 1998 ME 207, ¶ 18, 716 A.2d 222(followed)
- In re A.H., 2013 ME 85, ¶ 16, 77 A.3d 1012(followed)
- In re Marcus S., 2007 ME 24, ¶ 11, 916 A.2d 225(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…