Sultan Corporation v. Department of Environmental Protection

2022 ME 21 (2022) · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · April 5, 2022 · No. And-21-262

Summary

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court vacated in part a decision affirming a Department of Environmental Protection cleanup order against Sultan Corporation. The court held that the Board of Environmental Protection had to first determine whether the third-party defense under 38 M.R.S. § 1367(3) is available in proceedings challenging a cleanup order issued under 38 M.R.S. § 1365. The matter was remanded for further proceedings limited to that threshold issue.

Holdings

  1. The Board must first determine whether the third-party defense afforded by 38 M.R.S. § 1367(3) is legally available in proceedings challenging a Commissioner's order issued under 38 M.R.S. § 1365.
  2. The court may not affirm the administrative action by substituting a more adequate or proper basis for the grounds invoked by the agency; because the Board failed to determine the availability of the defense, the court was powerless to affirm the administrative action on that issue.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Board was required to determine, as a threshold legal matter, whether the third-party defense under 38 M.R.S. § 1367(3) is available to a party challenging a Commissioner's cleanup order issued under 38 M.R.S. § 1365.
  2. Whether the court could affirm the Board's decision on the ground that Sultan failed to prove the elements of the defense when the Board had declined to decide whether the defense was legally available.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (8)

  • Angell Family 2012 Prouts Neck Tr. v. Town of Scarborough, 2016 ME 152, ¶ 3, 149 A.3d 271(followed)
  • City of Old Town v. Expera Old Town, LLC, 2021 ME 23, ¶ 13, 249 A.3d 141(followed)
  • Me. Motor Rate Bureau, 357 A.2d 518, 527 (Me. 1976)(followed)
  • SEC v. Chenery Corp., 332 U.S. 194 (1947)(followed)
  • Gashgai v. Bd. of Registration in Med., 390 A.2d 1080, 1085 (Me. 1978)(followed)
  • Rossignol v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret. Sys., 2016 ME 115, ¶ 6, 144 A.3d 1175(followed)
  • Palian v. Dep't of Health & Hum. Servs., 2020 ME 131, ¶ 41, 242 A.3d 164(followed)
  • Avangrid Networks, Inc. v. Sec'y of State, 2020 ME 109, ¶ 37 n.11, 237 A.3d 882(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…