Summary
The Maryland Court of Appeals considered an application for leave to appeal from an order remanding a petitioner after a habeas corpus hearing. The court held that any double-jeopardy defense to pending rape or assault-with-intent-to-rape charges had to be raised at trial and could not be litigated pretrial through habeas corpus, and it denied the application.
Holdings
- Habeas corpus cannot be used to anticipate and litigate a double-jeopardy defense before trial; the defense must be raised at the trial of the pending criminal case and, if necessary, after an adverse verdict by appeal or motion for a new trial.
Questions Presented
- Whether habeas corpus could be used before trial to raise the asserted double-jeopardy bar to pending rape or assault-with-intent-to-rape charges.
- Whether the court should decide whether Brown's prior assault-and-battery conviction legally barred the pending prosecution.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (3)
- Loughran v. Warden, 192 Md. 719(followed)
- Bennington v. Warden, 190 Md. 752, 754(followed)
- Strait v. Beall, 198 Md. 677, 84 A.2d 697(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…