Summary
The Maryland Court of Appeals held that a back injury sustained by a pipe fitter while performing routine work was not an accidental injury compensable under the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Act. Because the injury resulted from a normal position and exertion, rather than an unusual strain, exertion, or employment condition, the court affirmed dismissal of the compensation claim.
Holdings
- An injury is accidental under Maryland workers' compensation law only when it results from some unusual strain or exertion or from some unusual condition in the employment; the claimant's evidence did not satisfy that standard.
Questions Presented
- Whether the claimant presented legally sufficient evidence that his back injury was accidental and therefore compensable under the Maryland Compensation Act.
- Whether an injury resulting from a normal position and ordinary exertion in the employment constitutes an accidental injury under Maryland workers' compensation law.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Stancliff v. H.B. Davis Co., 208 Md. 191(followed)
- Jackson v. Ferree, 173 Md. 400(followed)
- Fenton v. Thorley & Co., Ld., (1903) A.C. 443(rejected)
- Kelly-Springfield Co. v. Daniels, 199 Md. 156(followed)
- Caled Products Co., Inc. v. Sausser, 199 Md. 514(followed)
- Coal Co. v. Chisholm, 163 Md. 49(distinguished)
- Schemmel v. Gatch & Sons, etc., Co., 164 Md. 671(distinguished)
- Baltimore v. Schwind, 175 Md. 60(distinguished)
- Foble v. Knefely, 176 Md. 474(distinguished)
- Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. v. Zapf, 192 Md. 403(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…