In re Kaleb K.

390 Md. 502 (2006) · Court of Appeals of Maryland · January 11, 2006

Summary

The Maryland Court of Appeals held that Kaleb K. failed to preserve his argument that a delinquency petition should be dismissed under Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article § 3-8A-13(b), because he relied before the juvenile court solely on a different statute, § 3-8A-10(c)(4), and its actual-prejudice standard. The court affirmed the Court of Special Appeals without reaching whether the petition was untimely under § 3-8A-13(b).

Holdings

  1. An appellant does not preserve an argument based on a statute that was neither cited nor argued in the trial court, even when the appellant preserved the general right to appeal the denial of a motion to dismiss.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Kaleb preserved for appellate review an argument that the delinquency petition was untimely under Maryland Code section 3-8A-13(b) when he moved below under section 3-8A-10(c)(4) and did not cite or argue section 3-8A-13(b).
  2. Whether the juvenile court erred in denying the motion to dismiss the delinquency petition as untimely.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • In re Anthony R., 362 Md. 51, 763 A.2d 136 (2000)(discussed)
  • In re Kaleb K., 388 Md. 404, 879 A.2d 1086 (2005)(cited)
  • Wickman v. Bohle, 173 Md. 694, 196 A. 326 (1938)(followed)
  • Brice v. State, 254 Md. 655, 255 A.2d 28 (1969)(followed)
  • Banks v. State, 203 Md. 488, 102 A.2d 267 (1954)(followed)
  • State v. Bell, 334 Md. 178, 638 A.2d 107 (1994)(followed)
  • Basoff v. State, 208 Md. 643, 119 A.2d 917 (1956)(followed)
  • Medley v. State, 52 Md. App. 225, 448 A.2d 363 (1982)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…