Summary
The Maryland Court of Appeals construed Maryland Criminal Law Article § 10-615, which authorizes humane society officers to take possession of animals when necessary to protect them from cruelty or for their health. The court held that a humane society may not seize an animal already in State custody under a criminal search-and-seizure warrant, but may notify the owner of its intent to take possession upon the animal’s release from State custody. The court also held that the statute provides temporary possession rather than divesting the owner of ownership, and that an owner may petition for return of the animal when no administrative remedy is available.
Holdings
- A humane society may not take possession of an animal that is already in State custody pursuant to a criminal search and seizure warrant, but it may notify the owner or custodian of its intent to take possession when the animal is released from State custody.
- The physical seizure or removal of an animal need not be contemporaneous with the alleged abuse or neglect. The temporal relationship between the alleged mistreatment and the seizure is relevant to whether possession is necessary to protect the animal from cruelty or necessary for its health.
- Denial of a petition for return under § 10-615(d)(2) confirms the humane society’s temporary right to possess the animal but does not transfer ownership to the humane society. Possession reverts to the owner when continued possession is no longer necessary to protect the animal from cruelty or for its health.
Questions Presented
- Whether a humane society may invoke Maryland Code, Criminal Law Article, § 10-615 to take possession of an animal already in State custody pursuant to a criminal search and seizure warrant.
- Whether the conditions supporting seizure under § 10-615 must be contemporaneous with the seizure or may be based on previously observed abuse or neglect.
- Whether denial of a petition for return under § 10-615(d)(2) transfers ownership of the animal to the humane society or merely determines temporary possession.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (21)
- City of Hagerstown v. Witmer, 86 Md. 293, 300-01 (1897)(followed)
- State v. Falkenham, 73 Md. 463, 466 (1891)(followed)
- Hurd v. State, 190 Md. App. 479 (2010)(followed)
- Silver v. State, 420 Md. 415 (2011)(followed)
- Porter v. DiBlasio, 93 F.3d 301, 305-10 (2d Cir. 1996)(followed)
- New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987)(distinguished)
- Cunningham v. Feinberg, 441 Md. 310, 321-22 (2015)(followed)
- Friendly Finance Corp. v. Orbit Chrysler Plymouth Dodge Truck, Inc., 378 Md. 337, 342-43 & nn.4-5 (2003)(followed)
- Breck v. Maryland State Police, 452 Md. 229, 248 (2017)(followed)
- Patterson v. State, 401 Md. 76, 92-93 (2007)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.