Summary
The Bankruptcy Court considers cross-motions for summary judgment concerning an involuntary Chapter 7 petition filed against Steven C. Fustolo by three judgment creditors. The principal issue is whether an unstayed state-court judgment on appeal is subject to a bona fide dispute under 11 U.S.C. § 303(b)(1). The court also addresses the petitioning creditors’ claims, collateral securing certain debts, and whether the statutory requirements for an involuntary case are satisfied.
Holdings
- The court adopted the Byrd burden-shifting approach: an unstayed state-court judgment generally establishes a prima facie showing that the claim is not subject to a bona fide dispute, but the alleged debtor may rebut that presumption by presenting objective evidence of a bona fide dispute as to liability or amount.
- A bona fide dispute concerning a discrete portion of Patton Drive's judgment did not disqualify Patton Drive in its entirety. The undisputed portions of its claim could be counted for purposes of § 303(b)(1), and Patton Drive qualified as a petitioning creditor.
- The petitioning creditors satisfied the statutory claim-value requirement because Patriot held an approximately $20 million unsecured claim, which alone exceeded the statutory excess threshold after accounting for liens.
- Summary judgment was appropriate because the factual disputes identified by the parties were not material to whether an order for relief should enter.
Questions Presented
- Whether an unstayed state-court judgment on appeal is categorically not subject to a bona fide dispute under 11 U.S.C. § 303(b)(1), or whether the alleged debtor may rebut a presumption of no bona fide dispute.
- Whether Patton Drive qualified as a petitioning creditor when part of its judgment was subject to a bona fide dispute as to amount.
- Whether the petitioning creditors' claims exceeded the value of liens securing those claims by the statutory threshold under 11 U.S.C. § 303(b)(1).
- Whether summary judgment was appropriate because no material facts were genuinely disputed.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (14)
- In re Drexler, 56 B.R. 960, 967 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1986)(distinguished)
- Platinum Fin. Servs. Corp. v. Byrd (In re Byrd), 357 F.3d 433, 437-40 (4th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Marciano v. Chapnick (In re Marciano), 708 F.3d 1123, 1124-28 (9th Cir. 2013)(distinguished)
- In re Dilley, 339 B.R. 1, 6 (1st Cir. BAP 2006)(followed)
- In re Henry S. Miller Commercial, LLC, 418 B.R. 912, 920-22 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2009)(followed)
- In re Kelley, 498 B.R. 392, 397 (1st Cir. BAP 2013)(followed)
- In re Varrasso, 37 F.3d 760, 762-63 (1st Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986)(followed)
- In re Focus Media, Inc., 378 F.3d 916, 926 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- In re DemirCo Holdings, Inc., No. 06-70122, 2006 WL 1663237, at *3 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. June 9, 2006)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…