Summary
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of a respondent mother's parental rights to her minor child under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (c)(ii), and (j). The court rejected the respondent's procedural due-process challenge, concluding that she received adequate notice and service of the rescheduled termination hearing. The court also upheld the statutory-grounds and best-interests determinations based on the respondent's continued substance abuse, limited participation in services and parenting time, and the child's bond with his foster parents.
Holdings
- Respondent received adequate notice and service of the January 29, 2025 termination hearing, and her procedural due-process rights were not violated.
- Appellate relief was unavailable because respondent did not challenge the trial court's finding under MCL 712A.19b(3)(j), and only one statutory ground is required to terminate parental rights.
- The trial court did not clearly err in finding that termination was in KM's best interests and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by statute and court rule.
Questions Presented
- Whether respondent received constitutionally adequate notice and service of process of the termination hearing.
- Whether the trial court clearly erred by finding statutory grounds for termination under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (c)(ii).
- Whether the trial court clearly erred by finding that termination of respondent's parental rights was in KM's best interests.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (14)
- In re Lovitt, ___ Mich App ___, ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2024) (Docket No. 367124); slip op at 3(followed)
- In re Sanders, 495 Mich 394, 403-404; 852 NW2d 524 (2014)(followed)
- In re Ferranti, 504 Mich 1, 14; 934 NW2d 610 (2019)(followed)
- In re Simpson, ___ Mich App ___, ___; ___ NW3d ___ (2024) (Docket No. 368248); slip op at 3(followed)
- In re Moss, 301 Mich App 76, 90; 836 NW2d 182 (2013)(followed)
- In re Pederson, 331 Mich App 445, 472; 951 NW2d 704 (2020)(followed)
- In re White, 303 Mich App 701, 711; 846 NW2d 61 (2014)(followed)
- In re Ellis, 294 Mich App 30, 32; 817 NW2d 111 (2011)(followed)
- In re JS & SM, 231 Mich App 92, 98-99, 585 NW2d 326 (1998)(followed)
- In re Trejo Minors, 462 Mich 341, 353 n 10; 612 NW2d 407 (2000)(overruled_in_part)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…