Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court addresses whether motor-vehicle manufacturers’ emissions-testing test cells and an engine production line qualify for Michigan tax exemptions for air-pollution-control facilities under Part 59 of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act. The Court holds that qualifying equipment must be installed or acquired primarily to control or dispose of air pollution and must actually and physically control, capture, and remove pollutants. It reverses the Court of Appeals as to the test cells, reinstates the State Tax Commission’s denials, and affirms the denial concerning Detroit Diesel’s engine line and the rejection of its due-process claim.
Holdings
- The test cells do not qualify for the part 59 tax exemption because they were primarily used to test engines and vehicles for regulatory compliance, rather than to control or dispose of air pollution, and they did not themselves physically control, capture, and remove pollutants from the air.
- The Equinox Line does not qualify for a part 59 tax exemption because its primary purpose was manufacturing engines for sale, not controlling or disposing of air pollution.
- Detroit Diesel received due process because it received notice and a full hearing at which it could present evidence and legal arguments, and the Department of Environmental Quality considered the information developed at the hearing.
Questions Presented
- Whether the manufacturers' emissions test cells qualified as tax-exempt facilities under MCL 324.5901 and MCL 324.5903.
- Whether Detroit Diesel's Equinox engine-production line qualified as a tax-exempt facility under part 59 of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act.
- Whether the State Tax Commission's hearing process denied Detroit Diesel due process.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (17)
- Spiek v. Dep't of Transportation, 456 Mich. 331, 337, 572 N.W.2d 201 (1998)(followed)
- City of Taylor v. Detroit Edison Co., 475 Mich. 109, 115, 715 N.W.2d 28 (2006)(followed)
- Ford Motor Co. v. State Tax Comm'n, 274 Mich. App. 108, 732 N.W.2d 591 (2007)(reversed in part)
- Covert Twp. Assessor v. State Tax Comm'n, 407 Mich. 561, 287 N.W.2d 895 (1980)(followed and distinguished)
- Meijer, Inc. v. State Tax Comm'n, 66 Mich. App. 280, 238 N.W.2d 582 (1975)(distinguished)
- Grimes v. Dep't of Transportation, 475 Mich. 72, 89, 715 N.W.2d 275 (2006)(followed)
- Wexford Med. Group v. City of Cadillac, 474 Mich. 192, 207, 713 N.W.2d 734 (2006)(followed)
- Elias Bros. Restaurants, Inc. v. Treasury Dep't, 452 Mich. 144, 150, 549 N.W.2d 837 (1996)(followed)
- East Saginaw Mfg. Co. v. East Saginaw, 19 Mich. 259, 279 (1869)(followed)
- Michigan United Conservation Clubs v. Lansing Twp., 423 Mich. 661, 664, 378 N.W.2d 737 (1985)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.