Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court denied Valerie Marie Parks’s application for leave to appeal the Court of Appeals judgment. Justice Marilyn Kelly dissented, stating that the application raised a significant issue concerning whether custodial interrogations must be electronically recorded and what remedy should apply when they are not.
Holdings
- The Michigan Supreme Court denied the application for leave to appeal because it was not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Michigan Supreme Court should review whether the exercise of its supervisory powers requires all custodial police interrogations in Michigan to be electronically recorded.
- If an electronic-recording requirement should be adopted, what remedy should apply when police violate that requirement.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (8)
- Stephan v. State, 711 P.2d 1156 (Alaska 1985)(discussed)
- State v. Lockhart, 298 Conn. 537, 557 n. 10 (2010)(discussed)
- People v. Fike, 228 Mich. App. 178, 184 (1998)(discussed)
- State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d 587, 592 (Minn. 1994)(discussed)
- State v. Barnett, 147 N.H. 334, 338 (2001)(discussed)
- In re Jerrell C.J., 283 Wis. 2d 145 (2005)(discussed)
- Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 442 Mass. 423, 445-446 (2004)(discussed)
- Clark v. State, 374 Ark. 292, 304 (2008)(discussed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…