Summary
The Michigan Supreme Court denied the prosecution’s application for leave to appeal in a case involving suppression of a firearm discovered during a police encounter. Justice Markman dissented, concluding that the initial approach was consensual and that the officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry stop and frisk; Justice Zahra would have remanded for consideration as on leave granted.
Holdings
- The Michigan Supreme Court denied the application for leave to appeal because it was not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Michigan Supreme Court should review the lower courts' determination that police unlawfully seized defendant and that the firearm should be suppressed.
- Whether, under the circumstances described by the dissent, the officer's approach and questioning constituted a seizure and whether the subsequent stop and frisk was supported by reasonable suspicion.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (5)
- People v. Shabaz, 424 Mich. 42, 56 (1985)(followed)
- United States v. Drayton, 536 U.S. 194, 200 (2002)(followed)
- People v. Champion, 452 Mich. 92, 98 (1996)(followed)
- People v. Anthony, ___ Mich. App. ___ (2019) (Docket No. 337793)(cited)
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…