Summary
The Supreme Court of Michigan held that a defendant who pleaded guilty to open murder and later testified at a degree hearing waived the privilege against compelled self-incrimination by failing to invoke it. The court characterized the degree hearing as an extension of the plea proceeding and affirmed the defendant’s first-degree felony-murder conviction.
Holdings
- A degree hearing following a guilty plea to open murder is an extension of the plea hearing, and the trial court may question the defendant as necessary to determine whether the offense is first- or second-degree murder under M.C.L. § 750.318.
- The privilege against compelled self-incrimination is not self-executing; because Watkins answered the court's questions without invoking the privilege, he waived it and could not later claim that the questioning constituted error.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court could question the defendant at a degree hearing held after the defendant pleaded guilty to open murder.
- Whether the defendant waived the privilege against compelled self-incrimination by answering the court's questions without asserting the privilege.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- People v. Riddle, 467 Mich. 116, 649 N.W.2d 30 (2002)(followed)
- Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314, 324, 119 S. Ct. 1307, 143 L. Ed. 2d 424 (1999)(distinguished)
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966)(cited)
- People v. Smith, 257 Mich. 319, 241 N.W. 186 (1932)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…