Summary
The Minnesota Supreme Court held that an extended jurisdiction juvenile (EJJ) whose adult sentence was executed after a probation violation was entitled to credit for time served at a juvenile correctional facility. The court concluded that denying such credit to EJJ offenders while granting it to similarly situated juveniles certified as adults violated the Minnesota rational basis test for equal protection. The court reversed and remanded for determination of the appropriate credit, including possible credit for time spent in residential treatment facilities with jail-equivalent conditions.
Holdings
- Minn. Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 5, as amended, violates the Minnesota Equal Protection Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment because it denies jail credit to extended jurisdiction juveniles who later receive executed adult sentences while granting credit to similarly situated juveniles certified as adults, and the classification lacks a reasonable connection to the statute's goals.
- Garcia was entitled to jail credit for time served at MCF-Red Wing because the statutory classification denying such credit to EJJs was unconstitutional.
- Garcia may receive credit for time served at the Northwestern Minnesota Juvenile Center if the conditions there were the functional equivalent of those at a jail or workhouse; the district court must determine the amount of any such credit.
Questions Presented
- Whether Minn. Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 5, as amended in 2000, violated the federal and Minnesota Equal Protection Clauses by denying an extended jurisdiction juvenile credit for time served in a juvenile facility while granting such credit to similarly situated juveniles certified as adults.
- Whether Garcia was entitled to jail credit for time served at MCF-Red Wing and potentially at a residential treatment facility whose conditions were functionally equivalent to those of a jail or workhouse.
- Whether the amended statute violated the federal and Minnesota constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (9)
- State v. Willis, 376 N.W.2d 427, 428 n.1 (Minn. 1985)(followed)
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n, 615 N.W.2d 66, 74 (Minn. 2000)(followed)
- Kolton v. County of Anoka, 645 N.W.2d 403, 411 (Minn. 2002)(followed)
- State v. Russell, 477 N.W.2d 886, 888-89 (Minn. 1991)(followed)
- State v. Mitchell, 577 N.W.2d 481, 493 (Minn. 1998)(distinguished)
- Asfaha v. State, 665 N.W.2d 523, 524, 528 (Minn. 2003)(followed)
- In re S.L.M., 287 Mont. 23, 951 P.2d 1365, 1371-76 (1997)(persuasive)
- State v. Serena, 673 N.W.2d 182, 190 (Minn. App. 2003), rev. granted (Minn. Feb. 17, 2004)(persuasive)
- State v. Garcia, 670 N.W.2d 297, 300 (Minn. App. 2003)(reversed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…