Summary
The Minnesota Supreme Court held that Minn. Stat. § 204B.11, subd. 2, does not require signatures on a petition submitted in lieu of a filing fee to be collected during the statutory 14-day filing period. The court rejected the petitioner’s equal protection argument, granted the motion to dismiss, and denied the petition seeking removal of Gil Gutknecht’s name from the primary-election ballot.
Holdings
- Minn. Stat. § 204B.11, subd. 2, is plain and unambiguous and does not require signatures on a petition in lieu of the filing fee to be affixed during the 14-day filing period.
- The Equal Protection Clause does not require imposing the signature-timing limitation applicable to nominating petitions on petitions filed in lieu of filing fees because the two petitions serve different purposes and the filing-fee alternative is equally available to all candidates.
Questions Presented
- Whether Minn. Stat. § 204B.11, subd. 2, requires signatures on a petition filed in lieu of a filing fee to be affixed during the 14-day filing period.
- Whether the Equal Protection Clause requires the petition-in-lieu-of-filing-fee statute to impose the same signature-timing limitation applicable to nominating petitions.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- Camacho v. Todd and Leiser Homes, 706 N.W.2d 49, 53 (Minn. 2005)(followed)
- Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Bjelland, 710 N.W.2d 64, 68 (Minn. 2006)(followed)
- Wynkoop v. Carpenter, 574 N.W.2d 422, 425 (Minn. 1998)(followed)
- Christopherson v. Fed. Land Bank of St. Paul, 388 N.W.2d 373, 374 (Minn. 1986)(followed)
- Feick v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 307 N.W.2d 772, 775 (Minn. 1981)(followed)
- Metro. Sports Facilities Comm'n v. County of Hennepin, 561 N.W.2d 513, 516-17 (Minn. 1997)(followed)
- Burkstrand v. Burkstrand, 632 N.W.2d 206, 210 (Minn. 2001)(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…