Summary
The Minnesota Supreme Court reinstated Wendy Alison Nora to the practice of law after she demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that she was competent and morally fit to resume practice. The court placed her on supervised probation for two years, subject to conditions concerning monitoring, compliance with professional conduct rules, file supervision, and medical treatment.
Holdings
- The court approved the panel's determination that Nora had proven by clear and convincing evidence that she was competent and morally fit to resume the practice of law.
- Nora was reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately and placed on supervised probation for two years, subject to the conditions specified in the order.
Questions Presented
- Whether Nora established by clear and convincing evidence that she was competent and morally fit to resume the practice of law in Minnesota.
- Whether Nora should be reinstated subject to two years of supervised probation and the conditions recommended by the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board panel.
Disposition
approved
Cases Cited (4)
- In re Nora, 450 N.W.2d 328, 330 (Minn. 1990)(followed)
- In re Nora, 471 N.W.2d 670 (Minn. 1991)(followed)
- In re Nora, 489 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1992)(followed)
- In re Swanson, 343 N.W.2d 662, 664 (Minn. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…