Summary
The Minnesota Supreme Court reviewed whether property owned by Under the Rainbow Child Care Center qualified for exemption from real property taxation as an institution of purely public charity. The court held that North Star factor three—whether recipients receive the charitable benefit free of charge or at considerably reduced rates—is essential, and that Rainbow's market-rate tuition and limited write-offs did not satisfy that requirement. The court reversed the Minnesota Tax Court's exemption order.
Holdings
- An organization cannot qualify as an institution of purely public charity unless it satisfies North Star factor three. The organization must provide a substantial proportion of its goods or services free of charge or at considerably reduced rates, meaning considerably less than market value or cost.
- Rainbow was not an institution of purely public charity because it did not prove that it provided child-care services free or at substantially less than market rates or cost during 2004 and 2005.
- When the government pays directly for goods or services on behalf of one of its citizens, the payment is not a gift or donation for purposes of determining whether the provider qualifies for the property-tax exemption for institutions of purely public charity.
Questions Presented
- Whether Rainbow qualified as an institution of purely public charity exempt from real property taxation under Article X, section 1 of the Minnesota Constitution and Minn. Stat. § 272.02, subdivision 7, despite failing to satisfy the third North Star factor.
- Whether the third North Star factor, concerning whether recipients must pay for charitable assistance, is an essential condition for purely public charity status.
- Whether government payments made directly for child-care services on behalf of families should be treated as donations or gifts in determining charitable-exemption status.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (19)
- North Star Research Institute v. County of Hennepin, 306 Minn. 1, 236 N.W.2d 754 (1975)(followed and clarified)
- Mayo Foundation v. Commissioner of Revenue, 306 Minn. 25, 236 N.W.2d 767 (1975)(followed)
- SHARE v. Commissioner of Revenue, 363 N.W.2d 47 (Minn. 1985)(followed)
- Chateau Community Housing Ass'n v. County of Hennepin, 452 N.W.2d 240 (Minn. 1990)(followed)
- Chisago Health Services v. Commissioner of Revenue, 462 N.W.2d 386 (Minn. 1990)(followed)
- Community Memorial Home at Osakis, Minn., Inc. v. County of Douglas, 573 N.W.2d 83 (Minn. 1997)(followed)
- Rio Vista Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. County of Ramsey, 277 N.W.2d 187 (Minn. 1979)(distinguished)
- Assembly Homes, Inc. v. Yellow Medicine County, 273 Minn. 197, 140 N.W.2d 336 (1966)(overruled in part)
- Junior Achievement of Greater Minneapolis, Inc. v. State, 271 Minn. 385, 135 N.W.2d 881 (1965)(followed)
- Croixdale, Inc. v. County of Washington, 726 N.W.2d 483 (Minn. 2007)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…