Summary
The Mississippi Supreme Court reviewed a remand hearing concerning whether the prosecution’s peremptory strikes of African American prospective jurors violated Batson v. Kentucky and Powers v. Ohio. The court held that the State had offered race-neutral reasons for the challenged strikes and that Berry had not demonstrated purposeful discrimination or pretext. The court affirmed the denial of Batson relief.
Holdings
- The circuit court did not clearly err in finding that the State articulated race-neutral reasons for the challenged strikes and that Berry failed to establish purposeful discrimination or demonstrate that the reasons were pretextual.
- Berry's challenge to the circuit court's failure to make a detailed factual analysis was procedurally barred because he did not contemporaneously object or request specific findings; alternatively, the record supported affirmance and did not require another remand.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court clearly erred in finding that the State offered race-neutral explanations for its peremptory challenges against African American prospective jurors.
- Whether the circuit court was required to make a separate, detailed factual analysis of each party's arguments and each stated reason for the strikes.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (17)
- Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)(followed)
- Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991)(followed)
- Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765 (1995)(followed)
- Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991)(followed)
- McGilberry v. State, 741 So. 2d 894 (Miss. 1999)(followed)
- Coleman v. State, 697 So. 2d 777 (Miss. 1997)(followed)
- Woodward v. State, 726 So. 2d 524 (Miss. 1998)(followed)
- Lockett v. State, 517 So. 2d 1346 (Miss. 1987)(followed)
- Thorson v. State, 721 So. 2d 590 (Miss. 1998)(followed)
- Manning v. State, 765 So. 2d 516 (Miss. 2000)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…