Berry v. State

802 So. 2d 1033 (Miss. 2001) · Supreme Court of Mississippi · October 11, 2001

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court reviewed a remand hearing concerning whether the prosecution’s peremptory strikes of African American prospective jurors violated Batson v. Kentucky and Powers v. Ohio. The court held that the State had offered race-neutral reasons for the challenged strikes and that Berry had not demonstrated purposeful discrimination or pretext. The court affirmed the denial of Batson relief.

Holdings

  1. The circuit court did not clearly err in finding that the State articulated race-neutral reasons for the challenged strikes and that Berry failed to establish purposeful discrimination or demonstrate that the reasons were pretextual.
  2. Berry's challenge to the circuit court's failure to make a detailed factual analysis was procedurally barred because he did not contemporaneously object or request specific findings; alternatively, the record supported affirmance and did not require another remand.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court clearly erred in finding that the State offered race-neutral explanations for its peremptory challenges against African American prospective jurors.
  2. Whether the circuit court was required to make a separate, detailed factual analysis of each party's arguments and each stated reason for the strikes.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (17)

  • Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)(followed)
  • Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991)(followed)
  • Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765 (1995)(followed)
  • Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991)(followed)
  • McGilberry v. State, 741 So. 2d 894 (Miss. 1999)(followed)
  • Coleman v. State, 697 So. 2d 777 (Miss. 1997)(followed)
  • Woodward v. State, 726 So. 2d 524 (Miss. 1998)(followed)
  • Lockett v. State, 517 So. 2d 1346 (Miss. 1987)(followed)
  • Thorson v. State, 721 So. 2d 590 (Miss. 1998)(followed)
  • Manning v. State, 765 So. 2d 516 (Miss. 2000)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…