Ferrara v. Walters

919 So. 2d 876 (Miss. 2005) · Supreme Court of Mississippi · September 22, 2005 · No. No. 2002-CA-02052-SCT

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court held that sellers breached a real estate contract requiring them to cure title defects and convey the property by warranty deed. The court ruled that time was not of the essence because the contract did not expressly so provide and the circumstances did not clearly establish that intent. It reversed the chancery court's judgments and remanded with directions to dismiss the sellers' counterclaim and require specific performance.

Holdings

  1. A contract expressly requiring sellers to furnish a warranty deed obligated the Sellers to convey fee-simple title that was clear and marketable. Because the Sellers failed to establish heirship and reasonably cure the title defect, they materially breached the contract.
  2. The Sellers breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by failing to take affirmative steps to cure the title defect and instead pursuing a more lucrative third-party transaction.
  3. Time was not of the essence because the contract did not expressly so provide and the record did not establish a clear indication that the parties intended timely closing to be essential.
  4. Ferrara's refusal to close did not constitute a material breach because it resulted from the Sellers' failure to cure the title defect, and time was not of the essence. The Sellers were not excused from further performance.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the contract required the Sellers to cure the title defect and convey clear and marketable title by warranty deed.
  2. Whether the Sellers' failure to cure the title defect breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
  3. Whether time was of the essence under the real-estate contract despite the absence of an express time-is-of-the-essence provision.
  4. Whether Ferrara's refusal to close before the title defect was cured constituted a material breach excusing the Sellers' performance.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (32)

  • Hans v. Hans, 482 So. 2d 1117, 1119 (Miss. 1986)(followed)
  • Duane v. Saltaformaggio, 455 So. 2d 753, 757 (Miss. 1984)(followed)
  • Tinnin v. First United Bank of Miss., 570 So. 2d 1193, 1194 (Miss. 1990)(followed)
  • Bell v. Parker, 563 So. 2d 594, 596-97 (Miss. 1990)(followed)
  • In re Estate of Harris, 539 So. 2d 1040, 1043 (Miss. 1989)(followed)
  • Newsom v. Newsom, 557 So. 2d 511, 514 (Miss. 1990)(followed)
  • O.J. Stanton & Co. v. Miss. State Highway Comm'n, 370 So. 2d 909, 911 (Miss. 1979)(followed)
  • In re Savell, 876 So. 2d 308, 312 (Miss. 2004)(followed)
  • In re Johnson, 735 So. 2d 231, 236 (Miss. 1999)(followed)
  • Williams v. Williams, 843 So. 2d 720, 722 (Miss. 2003)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 32.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…