Summary
The Mississippi Supreme Court reviewed whether a chancery court awarded excessive alimony in the divorce of Danny and Wanda Holley. The court held that the $750 monthly periodic alimony award and $500 monthly arrearage payment were supported by the evidence and affirmed the judgment.
Holdings
- The $750-per-month periodic alimony award was supported by the evidence and was not manifestly erroneous or excessive.
- The chancellor properly averaged Danny's income over the six years preceding trial because his commission-based income fluctuated substantially.
- Periodic alimony may not be subject to a fixed time limitation and ordinarily terminates upon the recipient spouse's remarriage or either party's death; the award was therefore properly ordered to continue until one of those events.
Questions Presented
- Whether the chancery court's award of $750 per month in periodic alimony was excessive and unsupported by the evidence.
- Whether the chancery court appropriately calculated Danny's income by averaging his income over the six years preceding trial.
- Whether the chancery court properly awarded periodic alimony without a fixed time limitation and with termination upon remarriage or death.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Holley v. Holley, 2002-CT-00296-SCT (Miss. 2002)(followed)
- Harrell v. Harrell, 231 So. 2d 793 (Miss. 1970)(followed)
- McEwen v. McEwen, 631 So. 2d 821, 823 (Miss. 1994)(followed)
- Sanderson v. Sanderson, 824 So. 2d 623, 626 (Miss. 2002)(followed)
- Armstrong v. Armstrong, 618 So. 2d 1278, 1281-82 (Miss. 1993)(followed)
- Roberts v. Roberts, 924 So. 2d 550, 553 (Miss. App. 2005)(followed)
- Murphy v. Murphy, 631 So. 2d 812, 815 (Miss. 1994)(followed)
- Creekmore v. Creekmore, 651 So. 2d 513, 517 (Miss. 1995)(followed)
- McDonald v. McDonald, 683 So. 2d 929 (Miss. 1996)(followed)
- Waldron v. Waldron, 743 So. 2d 1064, 1065 (Miss. App. 1999)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…