Summary
The Mississippi Supreme Court held that plaintiffs in a consolidated action were improperly charged multiple filing fees and administrative costs exceeding the amounts authorized by statute. The court affirmed the order requiring a refund of the excess fees and remanded for further proceedings, rejecting the argument that its ruling should apply only prospectively.
Holdings
- Plaintiffs were entitled to a refund of all filing fees and administrative costs collected in excess of the amounts statutorily established by Mississippi Code sections 25-7-1 and 25-7-13.
- The request to apply the 2003 order prospectively was denied because that order did not change existing law; it applied and enforced the Legislature's previously established statutory fee scheme.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiffs were entitled to a refund of filing fees and administrative costs collected in excess of the amounts authorized by Mississippi law.
- Whether the Mississippi Supreme Court's 2003 order prohibiting multiple filing fees should apply only prospectively.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (1)
- City of Clinton v. Smith, 861 So. 2d 323, 326 (Miss. 2003)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…