Fletcher v. Diamondhead Incorporators

77 So. 3d 92 (Miss. 2011) · Supreme Court of Mississippi · October 27, 2011

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the chancery court’s decree incorporating the City of Diamondhead. The court held that the incorporation petition satisfied the statutory two-thirds signature requirement and that notice was proper despite continuances of the hearing. It also held that the objectors were not denied cross-examination and that the successor chancellor acted within his discretion by ruling without ordering a new hearing.

Holdings

  1. The petition satisfied Mississippi Code section 21-1-13 because the chancellor did not manifestly err in finding, based on substantial evidence accounting for deaths, moves, and other voter-roll inaccuracies, that at least two-thirds of the qualified electors residing in the proposed incorporation area had signed the petition.
  2. No renewed publication or posting was required when the properly noticed incorporation hearing was continued.
  3. The objectors were not denied due process because they had an opportunity to cross-examine the Incorporators' witnesses but did not exercise it.
  4. The successor chancellor acted within his discretion by deciding the nonjury incorporation proceeding without ordering a new hearing after the original hearing chancellor died.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the incorporation petition contained the signatures of at least two-thirds of the qualified electors residing in the proposed incorporation area, as required by Mississippi Code section 21-1-13.
  2. Whether the incorporation proceedings were jurisdictionally defective because the petitioners did not provide new publication and posting notice after the originally noticed hearing was continued.
  3. Whether the chancellor denied the objectors due process by failing to expressly direct the pro se objectors to cross-examine the Incorporators' witnesses.
  4. Whether the successor chancellor abused his discretion by ruling on the nonjury incorporation proceeding without ordering a new hearing after the original hearing chancellor died.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Incorporation of the City of Oak Grove v. City of Hattiesburg, 684 So. 2d 1274, 1276 (Miss. 1996)(followed)
  • City of Pascagoula v. Scheffler, 487 So. 2d 196, 199-202 (Miss. 1986)(followed)
  • In re City of Pearl, 279 So. 2d 590, 592 (Miss. 1973)(followed)
  • City of Jackson v. Byram Incorporators, 16 So. 3d 662, 670 (Miss. 2009)(followed)
  • Myrick v. Incorporation of Stringer, 336 So. 2d 209, 210-211 (Miss. 1976)(followed)
  • In re City of Ridgeland, 494 So. 2d 348, 352 (Miss. 1986)(analogized)
  • Norwood v. Extension of Boundaries of Itta Bena, 788 So. 2d 747, 751 (Miss. 2001)(followed)
  • In re Town of Mantachie, 685 So. 2d 724, 726 (Miss. 1996)(followed)
  • Sperry-Rand Corp. v. City of Jackson, 245 So. 2d 574, 575 (Miss. 1971)(followed)
  • In re City of Hattiesburg, 840 So. 2d 69, 74 (Miss. 2003)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…