Summary
The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of a wrongful-death action against Illinois Central Railroad Company as barred by the three-year Federal Employers' Liability Act statute of limitations. The court held that equitable tolling did not apply because the plaintiffs' first action was dismissed without prejudice after counsel failed to timely substitute a party following the death of the original plaintiff and otherwise failed to prosecute the case. The court concluded that the statute of limitations had expired before the plaintiffs filed their second complaint.
Holdings
- Equitable tolling did not apply because the first action was dismissed without prejudice after the plaintiffs failed to substitute a party and otherwise failed to prosecute the case; therefore, the statute of limitations was not tolled during the pendency of that action.
- Counsel's unexplained oversight and failure to file the substitution motion did not constitute excusable neglect, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding no excusable neglect.
- The second complaint was filed after the FELA statute of limitations had expired and was properly dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether equitable tolling tolled the three-year FELA statute of limitations during the pendency of the first wrongful-death action.
- Whether the failure to substitute a party within ninety days after the death of the original plaintiff constituted excusable neglect or otherwise justified equitable tolling.
- Whether the second wrongful-death action was barred because the statute of limitations had expired.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (16)
- Foss v. Williams, 993 So. 2d 378 (Miss. 2008)(followed)
- Burleson v. Lathem, 968 So. 2d 930 (Miss. 2007)(followed)
- Sarris v. Smith, 782 So. 2d 721 (Miss. 2001)(followed)
- ABC Manufacturing Corp. v. Doyle, 749 So. 2d 43 (Miss. 1999)(followed)
- Price v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co., 584 So. 2d 1279 (Miss. 1991)(followed)
- Burnett v. New York Central Railroad Co., 380 U.S. 424 (1965)(followed)
- [case] Knight v. Knight, Knight v. Knight, 85 So. 3d 832 (Miss. 2012)(followed)
- King v. Lujan, 646 P.2d 1243 (N.M. 1982)(persuasive)
- Suppeland v. Nilz, 623 P.2d 832 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980)(persuasive)
- Shaw v. Corcoran, 570 S.W.2d 96 (Tex. App. 1978)(persuasive)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.