Mississippi Division of Medicaid and Drew Snyder, in his Official Capacity as Director of Mississippi Division of Medicaid v. Windsor Place Nursing Center, Inc. d/b/a Windsor Place Nursing & Rehab Center, Billdora Senior Care, LLC, Lexington Manor Senior Care, LLC and Magnolia Senior Care, LLC

Mississippi Division of Medicaid v. Windsor Place Nursing Center · Supreme Court of Mississippi · May 14, 2020 · No. 2018-SA-01263-SCT

Summary

The Mississippi Supreme Court reviewed the Mississippi Division of Medicaid’s disallowance of legend-drug expenses reported by long-term-care providers for Medicaid per-diem reimbursement. The court held that drugs subject to direct reimbursement through the Medicaid drug program were nonallowable costs under the state plan and applicable Medicaid policies, and that the agency’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and within its authority. The court reversed the chancery court and rendered judgment reinstating the Division of Medicaid’s decision.

Holdings

  1. Legend drugs covered by the Medicaid Drug Program and subject to direct reimbursement from Medicaid to dispensing pharmacists are non-allowable costs on a nursing facility's per-diem reimbursement cost report.
  2. The Division's decision to disallow the claimed legend-drug costs was supported by substantial evidence, was not arbitrary or capricious, and was within the Division's authority.
  3. The Division's adjustments to the providers' cost reports did not constitute an impermissible retroactive change in rate methodology; they corrected costs that were non-allowable under the State Plan and existing Medicaid policy.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Division of Medicaid properly interpreted the Medicaid State Plan and Provider Policy Manual to classify legend drugs subject to direct Medicaid reimbursement as non-allowable costs on nursing-facility per-diem cost reports.
  2. Whether the Division's disallowance of the providers' legend-drug costs was supported by substantial evidence, was arbitrary or capricious, or exceeded the Division's authority.
  3. Whether the Division impermissibly applied a new policy retroactively by adjusting cost reports for reporting years before amendments to the cost-report instructions and State Plan.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (12)

  • Crossgates River Oaks Hosp. v. Miss. Div. of Medicaid, 240 So. 3d 385, 387 (Miss. 2018)(followed)
  • Miss. Comm'n on Envtl. Quality v. Chickasaw Cty. Bd. of Supervisors, 621 So. 2d 1211, 1216 (Miss. 1993)(followed)
  • Miss. State Bd. of Nursing v. Wilson, 624 So. 2d 485, 489 (Miss. 1993)(followed)
  • State Farm Ins. Co. v. Gay, 526 So. 2d 534, 535 (Miss. 1988)(followed)
  • Town of Enterprise v. Miss. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 782 So. 2d 733, 735 (Miss. 2001)(followed)
  • Sierra Club v. Miss. Envtl. Quality Permit Bd., 943 So. 2d 673, 678-79 (Miss. 2006)(followed in majority; criticized in special concurrence)
  • McDerment v. Miss. Real Estate Comm'n, 748 So. 2d 114, 118 (Miss. 1999)(followed)
  • King v. Miss. Military Dep't, 245 So. 3d 404, 408 (Miss. 2018)(followed in part; discussed in concurrence)
  • Jones v. Howell, 827 So. 2d 691, 693-94 (Miss. 2002)(followed)
  • Cent. Miss. Med. Ctr. v. Miss. Div. of Medicaid, No. 2018-SA-01410-SCT, 2020 WL 728806, at *1 (Miss. Feb. 13, 2020)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…