Summary
The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed a judgment requiring Joe R. Brooks to pay estimated state income taxes for tax years 1992 through 1996. The court rejected Brooks's challenges based on personal jurisdiction and the Director of Revenue's failure to adopt regulations specifying where income tax returns must be filed. A dissent argued that the Supreme Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the direct appeal and could not retain the case for reasons of judicial economy.
Holdings
- A party who appears in the trial court at later stages of the proceeding waives a challenge to personal jurisdiction.
- The Director's alleged failure to adopt regulations under section 143.511, RSMo, specifying where returns were to be filed or taxes paid did not excuse Brooks's obligation to pay income taxes or prevent collection of delinquent taxes.
Questions Presented
- Whether Brooks's later appearances in the trial court waived his challenge to personal jurisdiction.
- Whether the Director's alleged failure to adopt regulations specifying where income-tax returns or taxes were to be filed prevented collection of the delinquent taxes.
- Whether the Supreme Court of Missouri could retain the direct appeal despite the Attorney General's argument that the court lacked appellate jurisdiction.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- State ex rel. Lohman v. Latimer, 4 S.W.3d 560 (Mo. App. 1999)(followed)
- Alumax Foils, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 939 S.W.2d 907, 910 (Mo. 1997)(cited)
- State ex rel. White v. Marsh, 646 S.W.2d 357 (Mo. banc 1983)(followed)
- Farmers & Merchants Bank and Trust Company v. Director of Revenue, 896 S.W.2d 30, 32-33 (Mo. banc 1995)(followed)
- State ex rel. Lack v. Melton, 692 S.W.2d 302, 304 (Mo. banc 1985)(criticized)
- Pace v. City of Hannibal, 680 S.W.2d 944, 946 (Mo. banc 1984)(criticized)
- State v. Davis, 653 S.W.2d 167 (Mo. banc 1983)(criticized)
- State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151 (Mo. banc 1979)(criticized)
- Kuyper v. Stone County Commission, 838 S.W.2d 436, 438 (Mo. banc 1992)(cited by dissent)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…