Summary
The Supreme Court of Missouri reviews the Administrative Hearing Commission’s denial of a refund and assessment of sales and use taxes against a hot air balloon company. The court holds that Missouri sales taxes on gross receipts from untethered hot air balloon rides are preempted by the federal Anti-Head Tax Act, but concludes that the company is not a common carrier entitled to the claimed use-tax exemption for equipment purchased outside Missouri. The decision is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Holdings
- The federal Anti-Head Tax Act, 49 U.S.C. § 40116, preempts Missouri sales taxes imposed on gross receipts from all of Balloons' untethered hot-air balloon rides because those receipts arise from air commerce within the meaning of the Act.
- The claim that rides sold through out-of-state third-party vendors qualified for Missouri's resale exemption is moot because none of the hot-air balloon ride sales were subject to Missouri sales tax under section 144.020.1.
- Balloons was not a common carrier under section 144.030.2(3) or (20) because it did not establish that it held itself out to transport every member of the public without discretion to refuse service; consequently, it was liable for use tax on the balloon and inflator fan purchased in Texas.
Questions Presented
- Whether Missouri's sales tax on gross receipts from untethered hot-air balloon rides is preempted by the federal Anti-Head Tax Act.
- Whether sales of balloon rides through out-of-state third-party vendors qualified for Missouri's resale exemption or otherwise were taxable as retail sales.
- Whether Balloons qualified as a common carrier under section 144.030.2(3) or (20) and therefore was exempt from use tax on a hot-air balloon and inflator fan purchased outside Missouri.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (17)
- Street v. Director of Revenue, 361 S.W.3d 355, 357 (Mo. banc 2012)(followed)
- State ex rel. Proctor v. Messina, 320 S.W.3d 145, 148 (Mo. banc 2010)(followed)
- Twp. of Tinicum v. U.S. Department of Transportation, 582 F.3d 482, 490 (3d Cir. 2009)(persuasive)
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 485-86 (1996)(followed)
- Hill v. National Transportation Safety Board, 886 F.2d 1275, 1279-80 (10th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- FAA v. Landy, 705 F.2d 624, 634 (2d Cir. 1983)(persuasive)
- Gorman v. National Transportation Safety Board, 558 F.3d 580, 591 (D.C. Cir. 2009)(persuasive)
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l v. Quesada, 276 F.2d 892, 894-95 (2d Cir. 1960)(persuasive)
- Morris v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 833 F. Supp. 2d 622, 627 (N.D. Tex. 2011)(persuasive)
- Aquila Foreign Qualifications Corp. v. Director of Revenue, 362 S.W.3d 1, 3-4 (Mo. banc 2012)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…