Summary
The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed an order appointing paternal cousins as co-guardians and conservators of a minor child after finding the mother unable or unfit to serve as guardian. The court held that, under Missouri law, inability or unfitness in a minor guardianship proceeding under section 475.030.4 must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence, rather than clear and convincing evidence. The court also held that the judgment was supported by substantial evidence and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the mother’s motion for a continuance.
Holdings
- Section 475.030.4 requires proof by a preponderance of the evidence that a parent is unable or unfit to serve as guardian of a minor; it does not require clear and convincing evidence.
- The trial court's finding that the mother was unable or unfit to serve as the child's guardian was supported by substantial evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence.
- The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the mother's second motion to continue the guardianship hearing.
- The court declined to reach the mother's due process challenge because the record did not establish that the trial court used a preponderance standard and the constitutional argument was not timely preserved.
Questions Presented
- Whether section 475.030.4 requires proof by clear and convincing evidence, rather than a preponderance of the evidence, that a parent is unable or unfit to serve as guardian of a minor.
- Whether the guardianship judgment was unsupported by substantial evidence or was against the weight of the evidence.
- Whether denial of the mother's motion to continue the guardianship hearing was an abuse of discretion.
- Whether applying a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard violated the mother's due process rights.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976)(followed)
- Nelson v. Crane, 187 S.W.3d 868, 869-70 (Mo. banc 2006)(followed)
- Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982)(considered)
- Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976)(considered)
- In re Van Orden, 271 S.W.3d 579, 685 (Mo. banc 2008)(followed)
- Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 423 (1979)(considered)
- Martinez v. State, 24 S.W.3d 10, 20 n.10 (Mo. App. 2000)(followed)
- State ex rel. Taylor v. Russell, 449 S.W.3d 380, 382 (Mo. banc 2014)(followed)
- Turner v. Sch. Dist. of Clayton, 318 S.W.3d 660, 668 (Mo. banc 2010)(followed)
- In re Estate of L.G.T., 442 S.W.3d 96, 108 n.11, 116 (Mo. App. 2014)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…