State v. Warren

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court Sentence Review Division reviewed the defendant’s sentences for multiple drug-related and misdemeanor offenses. The Division unanimously affirmed the district court’s sentence, concluding that the grounds for modification did not establish that the sentence was clearly inadequate or clearly excessive.

Holdings

1. The sentence was not clearly inadequate or clearly excessive, so the Sentence Review Division affirmed it.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Warren's criminal sentence was clearly inadequate or clearly excessive such that the Sentence Review Division should modify it.

Disposition

affirmed