Summary
The Montana Supreme Court reviewed a delinquency disposition involving N.V., who was committed to the Department of Corrections and placed in a sexual offender treatment program. The Court held that polygraph information and evaluations influenced by that information could not be considered, requiring a new disposition hearing. It also held that the Youth Court lacked authority to extend jurisdiction beyond age twenty-one, while affirming the denial of family and counsel travel expenses.
Holdings
- Polygraph results are inadmissible in any court proceeding, and a disposition is impermissibly tainted when polygraph information indirectly enters the court's review through evaluations or recommendations.
- The Youth Court erred by considering Dr. Page's evaluation because the evaluation relied on polygraph information and reports influenced by that information.
- The Youth Court lacked a legal basis to extend jurisdiction beyond N.V.'s twenty-first birthday because the Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act did not apply to an offense punishable by life imprisonment or a potential sentence of one hundred years.
- The Youth Court did not abuse its discretion by denying funding for family travel and counseling.
- The Youth Court did not abuse its discretion by denying reimbursement for counsel's travel expenses to visit N.V. at Pine Hills.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Youth Court erred by considering polygraph information indirectly through evaluations and placement recommendations.
- Whether the Youth Court erred by considering Dr. Robert Page's psychological evaluation after that evaluation relied on polygraph-related information.
- Whether the Youth Court had authority to extend jurisdiction over N.V. until his twenty-fifth birthday.
- Whether the Youth Court abused its discretion by denying family counseling and travel expenses for N.V.'s family.
- Whether the Youth Court abused its discretion by denying reimbursement for appointed counsel's travel expenses to visit N.V.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (5)
- Samson v. State, 2003 MT 133, ¶ 17, 316 Mont. 90, 69 P.3d 1154(followed)
- State v. DuBray, 2003 MT 255, ¶¶ 28, 105, 317 Mont. 377, 77 P.3d 247(followed)
- State v. Anderson, 1999 MT 58, ¶¶ 12, 14, 293 Mont. 472, 977 P.2d 315(followed)
- State v. Staat, 248 Mont. 291, 293, 811 P.2d 1261, 1262 (1991)(followed)
- State v. McKenzie, 186 Mont. 474, 478-79, 608 P.2d 425, 427 (1979)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…