Summary
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Mary Fitzgerald’s petition to reinstate her driver’s license following its suspension for refusing field sobriety and breath alcohol testing after a DUI arrest. The court held that the appeal was without merit because sufficient evidence supported the district court’s findings and the district court correctly applied settled Montana law.
Holdings
- The District Court correctly denied Fitzgerald's petition because the record contained sufficient evidence to support its findings and the court correctly applied settled Montana law.
Questions Presented
- Whether the District Court properly denied Fitzgerald's petition to reinstate her driver's license under § 61-8-403, MCA (2007).
- Whether the record supported the lawfulness of the stop and arrest and the officer's handling of Fitzgerald's request to read the implied-consent advisory.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Hulse v. State, Dept. of Justice, 1998 MT 108, 289 Mont. 1, 961 P.2d 75(followed)
- Brown v. State, 2009 MT 64, ¶ 8, 349 Mont. 408, 203 P.3d 842(followed)
- Clark v. State, ex rel., Driver Imp. Bureau, 2005 MT 65, ¶ 6, 326 Mont. 278, 109 P.3d 244(followed)
- Brewer v. State, 2004 MT 193, ¶ 5, 322 Mont. 225, 95 P.3d 163(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…