Summary
The Supreme Court of Montana held that a challenge to whether an information alleged probable cause is not jurisdictional. The court further held that a defendant who enters a no contest plea without reserving the issue for appeal waives the right to challenge the adverse pretrial ruling. The court affirmed Michael Spreadbury's judgment for felony intimidation.
Holdings
- Whether the information included allegations establishing probable cause to support the charge is not a jurisdictional issue.
- A defendant who enters a no contest plea without specifically reserving for appeal the issue whether probable cause supported the information waives the right to raise that issue on appeal from the final judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether an alleged failure of an information to establish probable cause is a jurisdictional issue that may be raised after an unreserved no contest plea.
- Whether a defendant who enters a no contest plea without reserving a specified pretrial issue for appeal waives the right to challenge the adverse pretrial ruling.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- State v. Davis, 210 Mont. 28, 681 P.2d 42 (1984)(overruled)
- State v. Thompson, 243 Mont. 28, 792 P.2d 1103 (1990)(overruled)
- United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630, 122 S. Ct. 1781, 1785, 152 L. Ed. 2d 860 (2002)(followed)
- BNSF Ry. Co. v. Cringle, 2010 MT 290, ¶ 15, 359 Mont. 20, 247 P.3d 706(followed)
- Ex parte Seymour, 946 So. 2d 536, 538 (Ala. 2006)(cited)
- Patton v. State, 964 So. 2d 1247, 1250 (Ala. Crim. App. 2007)(cited)
- State v. Maldonado, 223 Ariz. 309, 223 P.3d 653, 655 (2010)(cited)
- State v. Morgan, 181 Ohio App. 3d 747, 910 N.E.2d 1075, 1083 (2009)(cited)
- State v. Daniel, 222 Or. App. 362, 193 P.3d 1021, 1024-25 (2008)(cited)
- United States v. Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 956 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…