In re V.M.D.

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed a parenting plan awarding the parents equal 50/50 parenting time with their child. The court held that the district court properly applied Montana's statutory best-interest factors and that its findings were not clearly erroneous or an abuse of discretion.

Holdings

1. The district court did not clearly err or abuse its discretion in determining that a 50/50 parenting plan was in V.M.D.'s best interests.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the district court clearly erred or abused its discretion by determining that a 50/50 parenting plan was in V.M.D.'s best interests.

Disposition

affirmed