Summary
The Montana Supreme Court reversed the district court’s reinstatement of Lorrie Bracha’s driving privileges. It held that failure to dim high-beam headlights for oncoming traffic, a misdemeanor under Montana law, provided particularized suspicion sufficient for an investigatory stop and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- In reviewing a decision on a petition for reinstatement of a driver's license, the Montana Supreme Court reviews factual findings for clear error and conclusions of law for correctness.
- Failure to dim high-beam headlights for oncoming traffic, when observed by a peace officer, is an adequate basis for an investigatory stop because it constitutes a misdemeanor offense and creates particularized suspicion that an offense has been committed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court applied the correct standard in reviewing the suspension and reinstatement of Bracha's driver's license.
- Whether an officer's observation that a driver failed to dim high-beam headlights for oncoming traffic creates sufficient particularized suspicion to support an investigatory stop.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- Anderson v. State, Dep't of Justice, Motor Vehicle Div., 275 Mont. 259, 912 P.2d 212 (1996)(followed)
- State v. Broken Rope, 278 Mont. 427, 925 P.2d 1157 (1996)(discussed)
- State v. Reynolds, 272 Mont. 46, 899 P.2d 540 (1995)(distinguished)
- State v. Lafferty, 1998 MT 247, 291 Mont. 157, 967 P.2d 363(distinguished)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…