Summary
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the termination of G.S.'s parental rights to M.S., an Indian child eligible for enrollment in the Northern Cheyenne Tribe. The court held that the Department failed to provide adequate proof of proper notice of the termination hearing under the Indian Child Welfare Act, but that the error was harmless. The court also concluded that the Department satisfied ICWA's active-efforts requirement and that the District Court made sufficient findings regarding the likelihood of serious emotional or physical damage to the child.
Holdings
- The Department failed to provide adequate proof that the Northern Cheyenne Tribe received proper notice of the termination hearing as required by ICWA and Montana Rule of Civil Procedure 5.
- The notice error was harmless and did not require reversal because G.S. failed to show a reasonable probability that he would have obtained a more favorable result absent the error.
- The Department satisfied ICWA's requirement to make active efforts to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family.
- The District Court made sufficient findings that continued custody by G.S. was likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to M.S.
- The District Court did not terminate G.S.'s parental rights through summary judgment and did not err by incorporating findings and relying on evidence presented at an earlier hearing.
Questions Presented
- Whether the termination proceedings complied with ICWA's notice requirements.
- Whether the Department satisfied ICWA's active-efforts requirement under 25 U.S.C. § 1912(d).
- Whether the District Court made the findings required by 25 U.S.C. § 1912(f) concerning the likelihood of serious emotional or physical damage to the child.
- Whether the District Court violated due process or improperly terminated parental rights through summary judgment and by relying on evidence from prior proceedings.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (16)
- In re K.B., 2013 MT 133, 370 Mont. 254, 301 P.3d 836(followed)
- People ex rel. S.R.M., 153 P.3d 438 (Colo. Ct. App. 2006)(persuasive)
- In re J.C., 2008 MT 127, ¶ 43, 343 Mont. 30, 183 P.3d 22(followed)
- In re F.H., 266 Mont. 36, 39, 878 P.2d 890, 892 (1994)(followed)
- In re A.N., 2000 MT 35, ¶ 39, 298 Mont. 237, 995 P.2d 427(followed)
- In re N.N.E., 752 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2008)(persuasive)
- In re Christian P., 208 Cal. App. 4th 437 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2012)(persuasive)
- In re G.L., 177 Cal. App. 4th 683, 695-96 (Cal. App. 4th Dist. 2009)(persuasive)
- In re C.H., 2003 MT 308, ¶ 21, 318 Mont. 208, 79 P.3d 822(followed)
- In re D.S.B., 2013 MT 112, ¶ 15, 370 Mont. 37, 300 P.3d 702(followed)
Showing top 10 of 16.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…