Summary
The Montana Supreme Court held that an appeal challenging dissolution of a temporary injunction was moot because the property the injunction sought to prevent from being sold had already been sold to a third party. The court affirmed the district court’s order, awarded the trustee attorney fees and costs under Montana’s trust code, and remanded for determination of those fees and costs.
Holdings
- The appeal was moot because the property had been sold to a third party, the sale the injunction was intended to prevent had already occurred, and reinstating the injunction could not provide effective appellate relief.
- Linda St. Peter was entitled to costs and expenses incurred in the appeal, including reasonable attorney fees, under Montana Code Annotated § 72-38-1004.
Questions Presented
- Whether the District Court manifestly abused its discretion by dissolving the temporary injunction preventing the trustee from selling the trust property.
- Whether the appeal was moot because the property had been sold to a third party and the requested relief—reinstatement of the temporary injunction—could no longer provide effective relief.
- Whether the appellee was entitled to attorney fees and costs on appeal under Montana Code Annotated § 72-38-1004.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Greater Missoula Area Fed'n of Early Childhood Educators v. Child Start, Inc., 2009 MT 362, ¶¶ 22-23, 353 Mont. 201, 219 P.3d 881(followed)
- Sudan Drilling, Inc. v. Anacker, 2014 MT 72, ¶¶ 8, 10-11, 374 Mont. 272, 320 P.3d 977(followed)
- Mt. W. Bank, N.A. v. Cherrad, LLC, 2013 MT 99, ¶ 30, 369 Mont. 492, 301 P.3d 796(followed)
- Progressive Direct Ins. Co. v. Stuivenga, 2012 MT 75, ¶ 17, 364 Mont. 390, 276 P.3d 867(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…