Interstate Explorations, LLC v. Morgen Farm and Ranch, Inc.

Interstate Explorations, LLC v. Morgen Farm & Ranch, Inc., 2016 MT 20 (2016) · Supreme Court of the State of Montana · January 26, 2016 · No. DA 15-0472

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Interstate Explorations, LLC’s motion to dismiss counterclaims arising from alleged hydrocarbon spills on Morgen Farm and Ranch, Inc.’s property. The court held that Montana’s Surface Damage Act does not establish an administrative proceeding requiring exhaustion before a surface owner may litigate damage claims. The court also concluded that the Montana Administrative Procedure Act applies to Title 82, chapter 11, rather than the Surface Damage Act in chapter 10.

Holdings

  1. A surface owner is not required to exhaust the process established by the Surface Damage Act before litigating a surface-damage claim in court because the Act's process is not an agency or administrative proceeding subject to mandatory exhaustion.
  2. The Surface Damage Act does not require completion of its process before litigation and does not preclude a person from pursuing other remedies allowed by law.
  3. Montana's Administrative Procedure Act exhaustion provision does not apply to the Surface Damage Act because the statutory reference to MAPA in § 82-11-141(1), MCA, applies to chapter 11, not chapter 10.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a surface owner must exhaust the statutory process under Montana's Surface Owner Damage and Disruption Compensation Act before litigating a surface-damage claim in court.
  2. Whether the Montana Administrative Procedure Act's exhaustion provision applies to the Surface Damage Act in Title 82, chapter 10.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • Pickett v. Cortese, 2014 MT 166, 375 Mont. 320, 328 P.3d 660(followed)
  • Ballas v. Missoula City Bd. of Adjustment, 2007 MT 299, 340 Mont. 56, 172 P.3d 1232(followed)
  • Lorang v. Fortis Ins. Co., 2008 MT 252, 345 Mont. 12, 192 P.3d 186(followed)
  • Stanley v. Lemire, 2006 MT 304, 334 Mont. 489, 148 P.3d 643(followed)
  • Stanley v. Holms, 267 Mont. 316, 883 P.2d 837 (1994)(followed)
  • Pinnacle Gas Res., Inc. v. Diamond Cross Properties, LLC, 2009 MT 12, 349 Mont. 17, 201 P.3d 160(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…