Summary
The Montana Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for Chouteau County in an action seeking removal of fences and gates obstructing a county road. The court held that Robert Sayers was barred by res judicata from relitigating whether Lippard Road was a county road, an issue decided in prior litigation.
Holdings
- A final judgment precludes future litigation of the same issues between the same parties; therefore, res judicata barred Sayers from relitigating whether Lippard Road was a county road.
- The district court correctly granted summary judgment to Chouteau County because Sayers was precluded from relitigating the controlling issue concerning Lippard Road.
Questions Presented
- Whether res judicata barred Sayers from relitigating whether Lippard Road was a county road after that issue had been finally determined in prior litigation between the parties.
- Whether the district court properly granted summary judgment to Chouteau County in the action seeking removal of fences and gates obstructing Lippard Road.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Sayers v. Chouteau County, 2013 MT 45, 369 Mont. 98, 297 P.3d 312(applied)
- Denturist Ass'n of Mont. v. State, 2016 MT 119, 383 Mont. 391, 372 P.3d 466(followed)
- Baltrusch v. Baltrusch, 2006 MT 51, 331 Mont. 281, 130 P.3d 1267(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…