Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court imposed a 60-day suspension on attorney Bradley A. Boyum for failing to complete estate-planning work, failing to communicate effectively with a client, and failing to cooperate promptly with disciplinary investigations. Reinstatement was conditioned on completing six hours of professional-responsibility education and serving two years of monitored probation.
Holdings
- When neither party files exceptions to a referee's findings of fact in an attorney-discipline proceeding, the Nebraska Supreme Court may treat those findings as final and conclusive and grant judgment on the pleadings as to the facts.
- Boyum violated Neb. Ct. R. of Prof. Cond. §§ 3-501.3, 3-501.4(a)(3), and 3-508.4, and violated his oath of office as an attorney, because he failed to perform paid estate-planning work, failed to communicate effectively with his client, and failed to cooperate promptly with the disciplinary investigation.
- A 60-day suspension from the practice of law was appropriate, with reinstatement conditioned on completion of 6 hours of legal education in professional responsibility and submission to two years of monitored probation after reinstatement.
Questions Presented
- Whether the referee's factual findings and the amended formal charges were sufficiently established to support judgment on the pleadings when neither party filed exceptions.
- Whether Boyum violated Nebraska professional-conduct rules governing diligence, client communication, and attorney misconduct, as well as his attorney oath.
- What discipline was appropriate for Boyum's misconduct, considering the aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Council, 289 Neb. 33, 853 N.W.2d 844 (2014)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Thebarge, 289 Neb. 356, 854 N.W.2d 914 (2014)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Sundvold, 287 Neb. 818, 844 N.W.2d 771 (2014)(followed)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Connor, 289 Neb. 660, 856 N.W.2d 570 (2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…