Barnes v. American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin

Barnes v. American Standard Ins. Co. of Wis., 297 Neb. 331 (2017) · Nebraska Supreme Court · July 28, 2017 · No. No. S-16-854

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court considered whether an insurer established, as a matter of law, that it mailed a policy cancellation notice by certified mail as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-516. The court held that the evidence created a genuine issue of material fact and that the district court improperly resolved inferences in favor of the insurer on summary judgment. The court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. Summary judgment is improper when the evidence leaves a genuine issue of material fact, and the court may not resolve factual disputes or draw disputed inferences in favor of the moving party.
  2. The insurer bears the burden of establishing an effective cancellation before the loss.
  3. Section 44-516(1) requires cancellation notices within its scope to be mailed by registered or certified mail; the insured need not actually receive the notice.
  4. American Standard's evidence did not establish as a matter of law that it mailed Barnes' cancellation notice by certified mail, so the issue had to be resolved in further proceedings rather than on summary judgment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence established as a matter of law that American Standard mailed the cancellation notice by certified mail as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-516(1).
  2. Whether the district court improperly resolved factual issues and drew inferences in favor of the summary-judgment movant.
  3. Whether the district court erred by dismissing Barnes' complaint with prejudice after ruling on the cross-motions for partial summary judgment.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (13)

  • Midland Properties v. Wells Fargo, 296 Neb. 407, 893 N.W.2d 460 (2017)(followed)
  • Brock v. Dunning, 288 Neb. 909, 854 N.W.2d 275 (2014)(followed)
  • Daniels v. Allstate Indemnity Co., 261 Neb. 671, 624 N.W.2d 636 (2001)(followed)
  • Houska v. City of Wahoo, 235 Neb. 635, 456 N.W.2d 750 (1990)(followed)
  • Sanders v. Mittlieder, 195 Neb. 232, 237 N.W.2d 838 (1976)(followed)
  • In re Adoption of Chase T., 295 Neb. 390, 888 N.W.2d 507 (2016)(followed)
  • Coleman v. C.I.R., 94 T.C. 82 (1990)(distinguished)
  • United States v. Ahrens, 530 F.2d 781 (8th Cir. 1976)(followed)
  • Wiley v. United States, 20 F.3d 222 (6th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Cropper v. C.I.R., 826 F.3d 1280 (10th Cir. 2016)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…