Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court considered whether an insurer established, as a matter of law, that it mailed a policy cancellation notice by certified mail as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-516. The court held that the evidence created a genuine issue of material fact and that the district court improperly resolved inferences in favor of the insurer on summary judgment. The court reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- Summary judgment is improper when the evidence leaves a genuine issue of material fact, and the court may not resolve factual disputes or draw disputed inferences in favor of the moving party.
- The insurer bears the burden of establishing an effective cancellation before the loss.
- Section 44-516(1) requires cancellation notices within its scope to be mailed by registered or certified mail; the insured need not actually receive the notice.
- American Standard's evidence did not establish as a matter of law that it mailed Barnes' cancellation notice by certified mail, so the issue had to be resolved in further proceedings rather than on summary judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence established as a matter of law that American Standard mailed the cancellation notice by certified mail as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-516(1).
- Whether the district court improperly resolved factual issues and drew inferences in favor of the summary-judgment movant.
- Whether the district court erred by dismissing Barnes' complaint with prejudice after ruling on the cross-motions for partial summary judgment.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (13)
- Midland Properties v. Wells Fargo, 296 Neb. 407, 893 N.W.2d 460 (2017)(followed)
- Brock v. Dunning, 288 Neb. 909, 854 N.W.2d 275 (2014)(followed)
- Daniels v. Allstate Indemnity Co., 261 Neb. 671, 624 N.W.2d 636 (2001)(followed)
- Houska v. City of Wahoo, 235 Neb. 635, 456 N.W.2d 750 (1990)(followed)
- Sanders v. Mittlieder, 195 Neb. 232, 237 N.W.2d 838 (1976)(followed)
- In re Adoption of Chase T., 295 Neb. 390, 888 N.W.2d 507 (2016)(followed)
- Coleman v. C.I.R., 94 T.C. 82 (1990)(distinguished)
- United States v. Ahrens, 530 F.2d 781 (8th Cir. 1976)(followed)
- Wiley v. United States, 20 F.3d 222 (6th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Cropper v. C.I.R., 826 F.3d 1280 (10th Cir. 2016)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…