Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court granted the Counsel for Discipline’s motion for reciprocal discipline against Joseph P. Cullan. Following an Iowa public reprimand for misrepresenting his prior disciplinary history in a pro hac vice application, the court imposed the same sanction and ordered payment of applicable costs and expenses.
Holdings
- A judicial determination of attorney misconduct in another jurisdiction is generally conclusive proof of guilt in a reciprocal-discipline proceeding and is not subject to relitigation in Nebraska.
- Public reprimand was appropriate, and the Nebraska Supreme Court imposed the same public reprimand entered by the Iowa Supreme Court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court should grant the Counsel for Discipline's motion for reciprocal discipline based on the Iowa public reprimand.
- What discipline was appropriate under the circumstances.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- State ex rel. Counsel for Dis. v. Murphy, 283 Neb. 982, 814 N.W.2d 107 (2012)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…