Ronald J. Palagi, P.C., LLC, and Edrie Arlene Wheat v. Prospect Funding Holdings (NY), LLC

302 Neb. 769 (2019) · Nebraska Supreme Court · April 5, 2019 · No. No. S-18-193

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the Douglas County District Court’s confirmation of arbitration awards and grant of summary judgment in favor of Prospect Funding Holdings (NY), LLC. The court held that the Federal Arbitration Act governed the agreement and that the appellants’ challenges to the underlying agreement were procedurally barred because they did not timely seek to vacate, modify, or correct the arbitration awards.

Holdings

  1. The Federal Arbitration Act governed because the agreement between a foreign company and a Nebraska resident concerning rights to personal injury settlement proceeds evidenced a transaction involving interstate commerce, and the parties expressly agreed that the FAA would apply.
  2. Once arbitration had occurred and the FAA governed the agreement, the court's role was strictly confined to the FAA's procedures for confirming, vacating, modifying, or correcting the awards. Because Wheat and Palagi did not timely seek to vacate, modify, or correct the awards, the court properly declined to consider their challenges to the validity and enforceability of the underlying agreement.
  3. The district court did not err in granting summary judgment before discovery was complete because Wheat and Palagi never invoked Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1335, never requested a continuance before the ruling, and submitted no affidavit identifying the facts they needed or establishing good cause for additional discovery.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the arbitration agreement involved interstate commerce and was therefore governed by the Federal Arbitration Act rather than Nebraska's Uniform Arbitration Act.
  2. Whether the district court was required to confirm the arbitration awards when Wheat and Palagi had not filed a timely motion to vacate, modify, or correct them under the Federal Arbitration Act.
  3. Whether the district court prematurely granted summary judgment before discovery was complete when the opposing parties did not invoke Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1335 or submit the required affidavit.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (11)

  • First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995)(followed)
  • Colwell v. Mullen, 301 Neb. 408, 918 N.W.2d 858 (2018)(followed)
  • State v. Henderson, 277 Neb. 240, 762 N.W.2d 1 (2009)(followed)
  • Wilczewski v. Charter West Nat. Bank, 295 Neb. 254, 889 N.W.2d 63 (2016)(followed)
  • Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel v. Hunan, Inc., 276 Neb. 700, 757 N.W.2d 205 (2008)(followed)
  • Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc., 539 U.S. 52 (2003)(followed)
  • Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265 (1995)(followed)
  • Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008)(followed)
  • Hartman v. City of Grand Island, 265 Neb. 433, 657 N.W.2d 641 (2003)(followed)
  • Lombardo v. Sedlacek, 299 Neb. 400, 908 N.W.2d 630 (2017)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…