Lassalle v. State

307 Neb. 221 (2020) · Nebraska Supreme Court · September 18, 2020 · No. No. S-19-810

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for the State in Brian Lassalle’s claim under the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act. The court held that the applicable labor contracts did not previously agree to pay employees for leave hours that would cause them to exceed 80 total hours in a biweekly pay period, and that the State could enforce its policy restricting such leave usage. The court also concluded that Lassalle’s class-certification motion was moot after summary judgment was entered.

Holdings

  1. The State was entitled to summary judgment because Lassalle could not establish a prior agreement to pay him for leave hours in addition to compensation for a fully worked 80-hour pay period. The labor contracts authorized DHHS to enforce its policy prohibiting such use of leave.
  2. The motion for class certification was moot because summary judgment eliminated Lassalle's legally cognizable interest in representing the proposed class.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the labor contracts constituted a prior agreement requiring the State to pay Lassalle for leave hours that would cause his total paid hours to exceed 80 in a two-week pay period, such that the refusal to pay violated the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act.
  2. Whether the district court erred in treating Lassalle's motion for class certification as moot after granting the State summary judgment.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Drought v. Marsh, 304 Neb. 860, 937 N.W.2d 229 (2020)(followed)
  • Pitts v. Genie Industries, 302 Neb. 88, 921 N.W.2d 597 (2019)(followed)
  • Timberlake v. Douglas County, 291 Neb. 387, 865 N.W.2d 788 (2015)(followed)
  • Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USA, 285 Neb. 808, 829 N.W.2d 703 (2013)(followed)
  • Pick v. Norfolk Anesthesia, 276 Neb. 511, 755 N.W.2d 382 (2008)(followed)
  • Professional Firefighters Assn. v. City of Omaha, 290 Neb. 300, 860 N.W.2d 137 (2015)(followed)
  • Kasel v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 291 Neb. 226, 865 N.W.2d 734 (2015)(followed)
  • Coffey v. Planet Group, 287 Neb. 834, 845 N.W.2d 255 (2014)(followed)
  • Kercher v. Board of Regents, 290 Neb. 428, 860 N.W.2d 398 (2015)(followed)
  • Ray Anderson, Inc. v. Buck's, Inc., 300 Neb. 434, 915 N.W.2d 36 (2018)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…