Melton v. City of Holdrege

309 Neb. 385 (2021) · Nebraska Supreme Court · May 28, 2021 · No. No. S-20-721

Summary

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed a workers’ compensation award to Benjamin Melton following a below-the-knee amputation caused by a work-related injury. The court upheld compensation for the loss of a foot and a 20-percent loss of leg function, rejected additional consecutive awards for the toes and leg, and found no clear error in denying waiting-time penalties, attorney fees, interest, or vocational rehabilitation.

Holdings

  1. The compensation court did not clearly err in finding that Melton retained functional use of his leg and in awarding compensation for a 20-percent additional loss of leg function beyond the loss of his foot.
  2. Melton was not entitled to compensation for a total loss of use of his leg because the evidence supported the finding that his leg was not useless for all practical intents and purposes.
  3. Melton was not entitled to separate consecutive awards for the loss of his toes and foot in addition to the below-the-knee amputation award, or to benefits for total loss of the leg.
  4. The compensation court did not clearly err in finding a reasonable controversy and denying a waiting-time penalty, attorney fees, and interest.
  5. Melton was not entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits because the evidence showed he could perform suitable work for which he had prior training or experience.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the compensation court properly evaluated Melton’s loss and loss of use of his leg, including the effect of his prosthetic device.
  2. Whether Melton suffered a total loss of use of his leg warranting benefits for loss of the leg.
  3. Whether Nebraska law required consecutive disability benefits for the loss of Melton’s toes, foot, and leg.
  4. Whether Melton was entitled to waiting-time penalties, attorney fees, and interest for delayed payment of permanent disability benefits.
  5. Whether Melton was entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-162.01(3).

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (10)

  • Rogers v. Jack’s Supper Club, 308 Neb. 107, 953 N.W.2d 9 (2021)(followed)
  • Parks v. Hy-Vee, 307 Neb. 927, 951 N.W.2d 504 (2020)(followed)
  • Smith v. Mark Chrisman Trucking, 285 Neb. 826, 829 N.W.2d 717 (2013)(followed)
  • Jacob v. Columbia Ins. Group, 2 Neb. App. 473, 511 N.W.2d 211 (1994)(applied and distinguished)
  • Herold v. Constructors, Inc., 201 Neb. 697, 271 N.W.2d 542 (1978)(followed)
  • D’Quaix v. Chadron State College, 272 Neb. 859, 725 N.W.2d 558 (2007)(followed)
  • Picard v. P & C Group 1, 306 Neb. 292, 945 N.W.2d 183 (2021)(followed)
  • Gardner v. International Paper Destr. & Recycl., 291 Neb. 415, 865 N.W.2d 371 (2015)(followed)
  • Rodriguez v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, 270 Neb. 757, 707 N.W.2d 232 (2005)(followed)
  • Bower v. Eaton Corp., 301 Neb. 311, 918 N.W.2d 249 (2018)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…