Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed a workers’ compensation award to Benjamin Melton following a below-the-knee amputation caused by a work-related injury. The court upheld compensation for the loss of a foot and a 20-percent loss of leg function, rejected additional consecutive awards for the toes and leg, and found no clear error in denying waiting-time penalties, attorney fees, interest, or vocational rehabilitation.
Holdings
- The compensation court did not clearly err in finding that Melton retained functional use of his leg and in awarding compensation for a 20-percent additional loss of leg function beyond the loss of his foot.
- Melton was not entitled to compensation for a total loss of use of his leg because the evidence supported the finding that his leg was not useless for all practical intents and purposes.
- Melton was not entitled to separate consecutive awards for the loss of his toes and foot in addition to the below-the-knee amputation award, or to benefits for total loss of the leg.
- The compensation court did not clearly err in finding a reasonable controversy and denying a waiting-time penalty, attorney fees, and interest.
- Melton was not entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits because the evidence showed he could perform suitable work for which he had prior training or experience.
Questions Presented
- Whether the compensation court properly evaluated Melton’s loss and loss of use of his leg, including the effect of his prosthetic device.
- Whether Melton suffered a total loss of use of his leg warranting benefits for loss of the leg.
- Whether Nebraska law required consecutive disability benefits for the loss of Melton’s toes, foot, and leg.
- Whether Melton was entitled to waiting-time penalties, attorney fees, and interest for delayed payment of permanent disability benefits.
- Whether Melton was entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-162.01(3).
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (10)
- Rogers v. Jack’s Supper Club, 308 Neb. 107, 953 N.W.2d 9 (2021)(followed)
- Parks v. Hy-Vee, 307 Neb. 927, 951 N.W.2d 504 (2020)(followed)
- Smith v. Mark Chrisman Trucking, 285 Neb. 826, 829 N.W.2d 717 (2013)(followed)
- Jacob v. Columbia Ins. Group, 2 Neb. App. 473, 511 N.W.2d 211 (1994)(applied and distinguished)
- Herold v. Constructors, Inc., 201 Neb. 697, 271 N.W.2d 542 (1978)(followed)
- D’Quaix v. Chadron State College, 272 Neb. 859, 725 N.W.2d 558 (2007)(followed)
- Picard v. P & C Group 1, 306 Neb. 292, 945 N.W.2d 183 (2021)(followed)
- Gardner v. International Paper Destr. & Recycl., 291 Neb. 415, 865 N.W.2d 371 (2015)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, 270 Neb. 757, 707 N.W.2d 232 (2005)(followed)
- Bower v. Eaton Corp., 301 Neb. 311, 918 N.W.2d 249 (2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…