In re Estate of Buddie Stull, 261 Neb. 319

622 N.W.2d 886 (2001) · Supreme Court of Nebraska · March 2, 2001 · No. Nos. S-99-1253, S-00-055

Summary

The Supreme Court of Nebraska reviewed an attorney-fee award in an estate matter involving the common fund doctrine. The court held that the county court properly considered the applicable reasonableness factors and did not abuse its discretion by awarding Attorney E. Michael Slattery one-third of the common fund generated through settlement negotiations. The judgment was affirmed.

Holdings

  1. The applicability of the common fund doctrine was established as the law of the case because the objectors did not seek further review of the Nebraska Court of Appeals' original decision.
  2. The county court did not abuse its discretion by awarding Slattery one-third of the sums recovered for the residuary estate from the common fund.
  3. The amount of an authorized attorney fee is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the county court abused its discretion in determining the amount of attorney fees payable to Slattery from the common fund.
  2. Whether the county court properly applied a one-third percentage to the common fund.
  3. Whether the county court considered the factors relevant to determining a fair and reasonable attorney fee.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • In re Estate of Stull, 8 Neb. App. 301, 593 N.W.2d 18 (1999)(followed as law of the case)
  • Hauptman, O'Brien v. Milwaukee Guardian, 7 Neb. App. 60, 578 N.W.2d 83 (1998)(followed)
  • Barnett v. Peters, 254 Neb. 74, 574 N.W.2d 487 (1998)(followed)
  • Rapp v. Rapp, 252 Neb. 341, 562 N.W.2d 359 (1997)(followed)
  • Hoiengs v. County of Adams, 254 Neb. 64, 574 N.W.2d 498 (1998)(followed)
  • Talle v. Nebraska Department of Social Services, 253 Neb. 823, 572 N.W.2d 790 (1998)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…