Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court held that the period from the filing to the final disposition of a defendant's discovery motion is excluded from the statutory six-month speedy-trial calculation under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1207(4)(a). Because excluding that period made Washington's motion to discharge timely before expiration of the speedy-trial period, the court sustained the State's exceptions and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- The entire period between the filing and final disposition of a defendant's discovery motion is excluded from the six-month statutory speedy-trial calculation under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1207(4)(a).
- Washington was not entitled to discharge because, after excluding the time during which his discovery motion was pending, the six-month statutory speedy-trial period had not expired when he filed his motion to discharge.
Questions Presented
- Whether the period from the filing through the final disposition of Washington's motion for discovery was excludable from the six-month statutory speedy-trial period under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1207(4)(a).
- Whether the district court erred by sustaining Washington's motion to discharge and dismissing the information.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (8)
- State v. Petty, ante p. 205, 691 N.W.2d 101 (2005)(followed)
- State v. McHenry, 268 Neb. 219, 682 N.W.2d 212 (2004)(followed)
- State v. Steele, 261 Neb. 541, 624 N.W.2d 1 (2001)(followed)
- State v. Ward, 257 Neb. 377, 597 N.W.2d 614 (1999)(followed)
- State v. Feldhacker, 267 Neb. 145, 672 N.W.2d 627 (2004)(disapproved)
- State v. Brown, 214 Neb. 665, 335 N.W.2d 542 (1983)(followed)
- State v. Castillo, 11 Neb. App. 622, 657 N.W.2d 650 (2003)(followed)
- State v. Covey, 267 Neb. 210, 673 N.W.2d 208 (2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…