Summary
The Nebraska Supreme Court reviewed the revocation of Rodney G. Zwygart’s certified public accountant license by the Nebraska State Board of Public Accountancy. The court held that the district court used the wrong standard of review under the Administrative Procedure Act and remanded for de novo review of the administrative record.
Holdings
- For a judicial-review proceeding commenced after July 1, 1989, the district court must conduct a de novo review on the record under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-917(5)(a), rather than apply the former limited standard based on whether substantial rights were prejudiced.
- The district court's erroneous limitation of its review constituted plain error and required reversal and remand for a de novo review of the administrative record.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Lancaster County District Court applied the proper standard of review when reviewing the Board's revocation of Zwygart's certified public accountant license.
- Whether the district court's use of a limited substantial-rights standard instead of de novo review on the record constituted plain error requiring remand.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (6)
- Fauss v. Norfolk Avenue Liquor Mart, 264 Neb. xxi (Nos. S-01-696, S-01-697, Sept. 18, 2002)(cited)
- Nebraska Liquor Distributors v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, 269 Neb. 401, 693 N.W.2d 539 (2005)(cited)
- In re Grand Jury of Lancaster County, 269 Neb. 436, 693 N.W.2d 285 (2005)(cited)
- McClure v. Forsman, 266 Neb. 90, 662 N.W.2d 566 (2003)(cited)
- In re Interest of Mainor T. & Estela T., 267 Neb. 232, 674 N.W.2d 442 (2004)(cited)
- Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi v. Dolan, 251 Neb. 457, 558 N.W.2d 303 (1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…