Summary
The Supreme Court of Nebraska reviewed a breach-of-contract dispute between Daniel Domjan, M.D., and Faith Regional Health Services involving recruitment, medical-direction, and promotional agreements. The court held that the jury instructions improperly characterized Domjan as an employee and applied an incorrect termination standard, creating prejudicial error. It reversed and remanded for a new trial on specified contract claims and the counterclaim, while leaving the Promotional Agreement judgment undisturbed.
Holdings
- The jury instructions, taken as a whole, were misleading and confused the jury by incorrectly characterizing Domjan as an employee and by applying a good-cause employment-termination standard rather than the contractually agreed material-breach-or-default standard.
- Faith Regional was entitled to a new trial on Domjan's claims for breach of the Recruitment Agreement and Director Agreement and on Faith Regional's counterclaim for breach of the Recruitment Agreement.
- The court did not reach Domjan's assignments of error because the disposition of Faith Regional's cross-appeal was dispositive.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court abused its discretion by denying Faith Regional's motion for a new trial on Domjan's Recruitment Agreement and Director Agreement claims and Faith Regional's counterclaim.
- Whether jury instructions using employment terminology and a good-cause employment-termination standard, rather than the parties' independent-contractor relationship and material-breach termination provision, were misleading and prejudicial.
- Whether the court needed to reach Domjan's assignments concerning the damages retrial and attorney fees.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- Roth v. Wiese, 271 Neb. 750, 716 N.W.2d 419 (2006)(followed)
- Worth v. Kolbeck, 273 Neb. 163, 728 N.W.2d 282 (2007)(followed)
- Jay v. Moog Automotive, 264 Neb. 875, 652 N.W.2d 872 (2002)(followed)
- Thompson v. Florida Drum Co., 651 So. 2d 180 (Fla. App. 1995)(analogized)
- Phipps v. Skyview Farms, 259 Neb. 492, 610 N.W.2d 723 (2000)(followed)
- Pribil v. Koinzan, 266 Neb. 222, 665 N.W.2d 567 (2003)(followed)
- Castillo v. Young, 272 Neb. 240, 720 N.W.2d 40 (2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…